The abortion debate certainly has a tendency to become emotional. There are many logical arguments used to argue for and against abortion, but these can be largely ignored in favor of appeals to emotion (such as trying to argue that pro-life people are trying to take away an important “choice” for women to make). Now, I’m certainly willing to talk to my own side and illustrate ways in which pro-life people make bad arguments in the hopes that they’ll make better ones (I credit my friend and pro-life mentor Josh Brahm for helping me see the value in treating both sides fairly, as well as my friend and pro-life philosopher, Steve Wagner, through my work with Justice for All).
A blog dedicated to defending human life, from fertilization to natural death, at an intellectual level.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
A Philosophical Response to Abolish Human Abortion
This will be a follow-up to my previous article on Abolish Human Abortion, which you can find here. Specifically, I’ll be responding to their article “I Argue from Science, Not Religion...” written by AHA member Brian Biggs.
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
A Fundamental Flaw Behind Abolish Human Abortion
This will be the first of two articles regarding pro-life activist group Abolish Human Abortion.